Model Comparison
Runway Gen-3 Alpha vs Veo 2
Runway Gen-3 Alpha: ExtremeVeo 2: Extreme
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Veo 2 uses 75% more energy per query.
Veo 2 uses 75% more energy than Runway Gen-3 Alpha
350.0 Wh vs 200.0 Wh per query · 46.0 g vs 70.0 g CO₂ · 380 mL vs 370 mL water
Runway Gen-3 Alpha
Runway
Energy per query200.0 Wh
CO₂ per query70.0 g
Water per query370 mL
VS
Veo 2
Google
Energy per query350.0 Wh
CO₂ per query46.0 g
Water per query380 mL
Runway Gen-3 Alpha
ProviderRunway
CategoryVideo Generation
Inference LocationAWS / Google Cloud
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierExtreme
Veo 2
ProviderGoogle
CategoryVideo Generation
Inference LocationGoogle global network (64% renewable)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierExtreme
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Runway Gen-3 Alpha or Veo 2?
Veo 2 uses 75% more energy per query than Runway Gen-3 Alpha. Runway Gen-3 Alpha uses 200.0 Wh per query, while Veo 2 uses 350.0 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Runway Gen-3 Alpha and Veo 2?
Runway Gen-3 Alpha uses 52% more CO₂ per query than Veo 2. Runway Gen-3 Alpha emits 70.0 g of CO₂ per query compared to Veo 2's 46.0 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Runway Gen-3 Alpha or Veo 2?
Runway Gen-3 Alpha is the more environmentally friendly option, using 200.0 Wh per query compared to Veo 2's 350.0 Wh. That makes Veo 2 roughly 1.8x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Runway Gen-3 Alpha and Veo 2 adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute