Model Comparison
Runway Gen-3 Alpha vs Veo 3
Runway Gen-3 Alpha: ExtremeVeo 3: Extreme
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Veo 3 uses 2.0x more energy per query.
Veo 3 uses 2.0x more energy than Runway Gen-3 Alpha
400.0 Wh vs 200.0 Wh per query · 52.0 g vs 70.0 g CO₂ · 430 mL vs 370 mL water
Runway Gen-3 Alpha
Runway
Energy per query200.0 Wh
CO₂ per query70.0 g
Water per query370 mL
VS
Veo 3
Google
Energy per query400.0 Wh
CO₂ per query52.0 g
Water per query430 mL
Runway Gen-3 Alpha
ProviderRunway
CategoryVideo Generation
Inference LocationAWS / Google Cloud
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierExtreme
Veo 3
ProviderGoogle
CategoryVideo Generation
Inference LocationGoogle global network (64% renewable)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierExtreme
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Runway Gen-3 Alpha or Veo 3?
Veo 3 uses 2.0x more energy per query than Runway Gen-3 Alpha. Runway Gen-3 Alpha uses 200.0 Wh per query, while Veo 3 uses 400.0 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Runway Gen-3 Alpha and Veo 3?
Runway Gen-3 Alpha uses 35% more CO₂ per query than Veo 3. Runway Gen-3 Alpha emits 70.0 g of CO₂ per query compared to Veo 3's 52.0 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Runway Gen-3 Alpha or Veo 3?
Runway Gen-3 Alpha is the more environmentally friendly option, using 200.0 Wh per query compared to Veo 3's 400.0 Wh. That makes Veo 3 roughly 2.0x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Runway Gen-3 Alpha and Veo 3 adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute