Model Comparison
Sora vs Veo 2
Sora: ExtremeVeo 2: Extreme
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Sora uses 43% more energy per query.
Sora uses 43% more energy than Veo 2
500.0 Wh vs 350.0 Wh per query · 225.0 g vs 46.0 g CO₂ · 1.85 L vs 380 mL water
Sora
OpenAI
Energy per query500.0 Wh
CO₂ per query225.0 g
Water per query1.85 L
VS
Veo 2
Google
Energy per query350.0 Wh
CO₂ per query46.0 g
Water per query380 mL
Sora
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryVideo Generation
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierExtreme
Veo 2
ProviderGoogle
CategoryVideo Generation
Inference LocationGoogle global network (64% renewable)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierExtreme
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Sora or Veo 2?
Sora uses 43% more energy per query than Veo 2. Sora uses 500.0 Wh per query, while Veo 2 uses 350.0 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Sora and Veo 2?
Sora uses 4.9x more CO₂ per query than Veo 2. Sora emits 225.0 g of CO₂ per query compared to Veo 2's 46.0 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Sora or Veo 2?
Veo 2 is the more environmentally friendly option, using 350.0 Wh per query compared to Sora's 500.0 Wh. That makes Sora roughly 1.4x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Sora and Veo 2 adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute