Model Comparison
GPT-4o Image Generation vs GPT Image 2
GPT-4o Image Generation: HeavyGPT Image 2: Heavy
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. GPT Image 2 uses 11% more energy per query.
GPT Image 2 uses 11% more energy than GPT-4o Image Generation
5.0 Wh vs 4.5 Wh per query · 2.2 g vs 2.0 g CO₂ · 18 mL vs 16 mL water
GPT-4o Image Generation
OpenAI
Energy per query4.5 Wh
CO₂ per query2.0 g
Water per query16 mL
VS
GPT Image 2
OpenAI
Energy per query5.0 Wh
CO₂ per query2.2 g
Water per query18 mL
GPT-4o Image Generation
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
GPT Image 2
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationAzure / Multi-cloud
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GPT-4o Image Generation or GPT Image 2?
GPT Image 2 uses 11% more energy per query than GPT-4o Image Generation. GPT-4o Image Generation uses 4.5 Wh per query, while GPT Image 2 uses 5.0 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT-4o Image Generation and GPT Image 2?
GPT Image 2 uses 9% more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o Image Generation. GPT-4o Image Generation emits 2.0 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT Image 2's 2.2 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT-4o Image Generation or GPT Image 2?
GPT-4o Image Generation is the more environmentally friendly option, using 4.5 Wh per query compared to GPT Image 2's 5.0 Wh. That makes GPT Image 2 roughly 1.1x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GPT-4o Image Generation and GPT Image 2 adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute