Model Comparison

Claude Sonnet 4 vs GPT-4o Image Generation

Claude Sonnet 4: StandardGPT-4o Image Generation: Heavy

Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. GPT-4o Image Generation uses 80% more energy per query.

GPT-4o Image Generation uses 80% more energy than Claude Sonnet 4
4.5 Wh vs 2.5 Wh per query · 2.0 g vs 0.88 g CO · 16 mL vs 5 mL water
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
Energy per query2.5 Wh
CO per query0.88 g
Water per query5 mL
VS
GPT-4o Image Generation
OpenAI
Energy per query4.5 Wh
CO per query2.0 g
Water per query16 mL

Claude Sonnet 4

ProviderAnthropic
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAWS US East (Virginia) / US West (Oregon)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard

GPT-4o Image Generation

ProviderOpenAI
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which uses more energy, Claude Sonnet 4 or GPT-4o Image Generation?

GPT-4o Image Generation uses 80% more energy per query than Claude Sonnet 4. Claude Sonnet 4 uses 2.5 Wh per query, while GPT-4o Image Generation uses 4.5 Wh.

What is the carbon footprint difference between Claude Sonnet 4 and GPT-4o Image Generation?

GPT-4o Image Generation uses 2.3x more CO₂ per query than Claude Sonnet 4. Claude Sonnet 4 emits 0.88 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o Image Generation's 2.0 g.

Which is more environmentally friendly, Claude Sonnet 4 or GPT-4o Image Generation?

Claude Sonnet 4 is the more environmentally friendly option, using 2.5 Wh per query compared to GPT-4o Image Generation's 4.5 Wh. That makes GPT-4o Image Generation roughly 1.8x more energy-intensive.

Calculate your footprint with these models

See how your daily usage of Claude Sonnet 4 and GPT-4o Image Generation adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.

Calculate My Compute
View Claude Sonnet 4 detailsView GPT-4o Image Generation details