Model Comparison
Flux.1 Dev vs GPT-4o Image Generation
Flux.1 Dev: HeavyGPT-4o Image Generation: Heavy
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. GPT-4o Image Generation uses 18% more energy per query.
GPT-4o Image Generation uses 18% more energy than Flux.1 Dev
4.5 Wh vs 3.8 Wh per query · 2.0 g vs 1.5 g CO₂ · 16 mL vs 7 mL water
Flux.1 Dev
Black Forest Labs
Energy per query3.8 Wh
CO₂ per query1.5 g
Water per query7 mL
VS
GPT-4o Image Generation
OpenAI
Energy per query4.5 Wh
CO₂ per query2.0 g
Water per query16 mL
Flux.1 Dev
ProviderBlack Forest Labs
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationSelf-hosted (varies)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
GPT-4o Image Generation
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Flux.1 Dev or GPT-4o Image Generation?
GPT-4o Image Generation uses 18% more energy per query than Flux.1 Dev. Flux.1 Dev uses 3.8 Wh per query, while GPT-4o Image Generation uses 4.5 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Flux.1 Dev and GPT-4o Image Generation?
GPT-4o Image Generation uses 33% more CO₂ per query than Flux.1 Dev. Flux.1 Dev emits 1.5 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o Image Generation's 2.0 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Flux.1 Dev or GPT-4o Image Generation?
Flux.1 Dev is the more environmentally friendly option, using 3.8 Wh per query compared to GPT-4o Image Generation's 4.5 Wh. That makes GPT-4o Image Generation roughly 1.2x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Flux.1 Dev and GPT-4o Image Generation adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute