Model Comparison
DALL-E 3 vs GPT-4o Image Generation
DALL-E 3: HeavyGPT-4o Image Generation: Heavy
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. GPT-4o Image Generation uses 50% more energy per query.
GPT-4o Image Generation uses 50% more energy than DALL-E 3
4.5 Wh vs 3.0 Wh per query · 2.0 g vs 1.2 g CO₂ · 16 mL vs 11 mL water
DALL-E 3
OpenAI
Energy per query3.0 Wh
CO₂ per query1.2 g
Water per query11 mL
VS
GPT-4o Image Generation
OpenAI
Energy per query4.5 Wh
CO₂ per query2.0 g
Water per query16 mL
DALL-E 3
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
GPT-4o Image Generation
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, DALL-E 3 or GPT-4o Image Generation?
GPT-4o Image Generation uses 50% more energy per query than DALL-E 3. DALL-E 3 uses 3.0 Wh per query, while GPT-4o Image Generation uses 4.5 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between DALL-E 3 and GPT-4o Image Generation?
GPT-4o Image Generation uses 67% more CO₂ per query than DALL-E 3. DALL-E 3 emits 1.2 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o Image Generation's 2.0 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, DALL-E 3 or GPT-4o Image Generation?
DALL-E 3 is the more environmentally friendly option, using 3.0 Wh per query compared to GPT-4o Image Generation's 4.5 Wh. That makes GPT-4o Image Generation roughly 1.5x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of DALL-E 3 and GPT-4o Image Generation adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute