AI Provider Profile

Anthropic Sustainability Profile

Low Transparency

Environmental impact data for 12 tracked Anthropic models.

12
Models tracked
3.1 Wh
Avg. energy / query
2
Categories
0
Open-source

Sustainability Profile

Renewable Energy

Not published

Emissions Trend

Not published

Water Trend

Committed to water-efficient cooling

Transparency Rating

Low

Claude scored highest eco-efficiency on AWS. No emissions data published.

How Anthropic Compares

Anthropic's average metrics compared to the full dataset of 152 models

Energy / query

This provider3.1 Wh
Dataset avg.48.1 Wh
Difference-94%

CO2 / query

Provider avg.1.1 g
Dataset avg.14.5 g
Difference-93%

Water / query

Provider avg.6 mL
Dataset avg.105 mL
Difference-94%

Environmental Overview

With 12 models across 2 categories, Anthropic has a substantial presence in the AI landscape. Their models are notably efficient, averaging 3.1 Wh per query — less than half the dataset average of 48.1 Wh. Their lineup spans from Claude 3 Haiku (0.40 Wh) to Claude Opus 4.6 (6.5 Wh), showing meaningful variation in energy needs. Environmental transparency remains limited for Anthropic. Claude scored highest eco-efficiency on AWS. No emissions data published.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many AI models does Anthropic have?

Anthropic has 12 AI models tracked in the Know Your Compute database, spanning 2 categories: Text / Chat, Code Assistant.

What is Anthropic's most energy-efficient model?

Anthropic's most energy-efficient model is Claude 3 Haiku, consuming 0.40 Wh per query. Their least efficient model is Claude Opus 4.6 at 6.5 Wh per query.

Does Anthropic use renewable energy?

Anthropic's renewable energy claim: Not published. Claude scored highest eco-efficiency on AWS. No emissions data published.

Calculate your Anthropic footprint

Use our calculator to estimate your personal environmental impact from Anthropic models.

Calculate My Compute