Model Comparison
Phi-4 Multimodal vs Qwen 3.5 Omni
Phi-4 Multimodal: Ultra-efficientQwen 3.5 Omni: Standard
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Qwen 3.5 Omni uses 12.5x more energy per query.
Qwen 3.5 Omni uses 12.5x more energy than Phi-4 Multimodal
1.5 Wh vs 0.12 Wh per query · 0.79 g vs 0.05 g CO₂ · 6 mL vs 0.45 mL water
Phi-4 Multimodal
Microsoft
Energy per query0.12 Wh
CO₂ per query0.05 g
Water per query0.45 mL
VS
Qwen 3.5 Omni
Alibaba
Energy per query1.5 Wh
CO₂ per query0.79 g
Water per query6 mL
Phi-4 Multimodal
ProviderMicrosoft
CategoryMultimodal
Inference LocationSelf-hosted / Azure
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Qwen 3.5 Omni
ProviderAlibaba
CategoryMultimodal
Inference LocationAlibaba Cloud / self-hosted
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Phi-4 Multimodal or Qwen 3.5 Omni?
Qwen 3.5 Omni uses 12.5x more energy per query than Phi-4 Multimodal. Phi-4 Multimodal uses 0.12 Wh per query, while Qwen 3.5 Omni uses 1.5 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Phi-4 Multimodal and Qwen 3.5 Omni?
Qwen 3.5 Omni uses 15.8x more CO₂ per query than Phi-4 Multimodal. Phi-4 Multimodal emits 0.05 g of CO₂ per query compared to Qwen 3.5 Omni's 0.79 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Phi-4 Multimodal or Qwen 3.5 Omni?
Phi-4 Multimodal is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.12 Wh per query compared to Qwen 3.5 Omni's 1.5 Wh. That makes Qwen 3.5 Omni roughly 12.5x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Phi-4 Multimodal and Qwen 3.5 Omni adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute