Model Comparison

LLaMA 3.2 11B Vision vs LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision

LLaMA 3.2 11B Vision: StandardLLaMA 3.2 90B Vision: Standard

Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision uses 3.0x more energy per query.

LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision uses 3.0x more energy than LLaMA 3.2 11B Vision
1.5 Wh vs 0.50 Wh per query · 0.60 g vs 0.20 g CO · 3 mL vs 0.95 mL water
LLaMA 3.2 11B Vision
Meta
Energy per query0.50 Wh
CO per query0.20 g
Water per query0.95 mL
VS
LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision
Meta
Energy per query1.5 Wh
CO per query0.60 g
Water per query3 mL

LLaMA 3.2 11B Vision

ProviderMeta
CategoryMultimodal
Inference LocationSelf-hosted (varies)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard

LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision

ProviderMeta
CategoryMultimodal
Inference LocationSelf-hosted (varies, requires multi-GPU)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard

Frequently Asked Questions

Which uses more energy, LLaMA 3.2 11B Vision or LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision?

LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision uses 3.0x more energy per query than LLaMA 3.2 11B Vision. LLaMA 3.2 11B Vision uses 0.50 Wh per query, while LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision uses 1.5 Wh.

What is the carbon footprint difference between LLaMA 3.2 11B Vision and LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision?

LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision uses 3.0x more CO₂ per query than LLaMA 3.2 11B Vision. LLaMA 3.2 11B Vision emits 0.20 g of CO₂ per query compared to LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision's 0.60 g.

Which is more environmentally friendly, LLaMA 3.2 11B Vision or LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision?

LLaMA 3.2 11B Vision is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.50 Wh per query compared to LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision's 1.5 Wh. That makes LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision roughly 3.0x more energy-intensive.

Calculate your footprint with these models

See how your daily usage of LLaMA 3.2 11B Vision and LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.

Calculate My Compute
View LLaMA 3.2 11B Vision detailsView LLaMA 3.2 90B Vision details