Model Comparison
GPT Image 2 vs Midjourney
GPT Image 2: HeavyMidjourney: Heavy
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Midjourney uses 50% more energy per query.
Midjourney uses 50% more energy than GPT Image 2
7.5 Wh vs 5.0 Wh per query · 2.3 g vs 2.2 g CO₂ · 14 mL vs 18 mL water
GPT Image 2
OpenAI
Energy per query5.0 Wh
CO₂ per query2.2 g
Water per query18 mL
VS
Midjourney
Midjourney
Energy per query7.5 Wh
CO₂ per query2.3 g
Water per query14 mL
GPT Image 2
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationAzure / Multi-cloud
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Midjourney
ProviderMidjourney
CategoryImage Generation
Inference LocationGoogle Cloud (US/EU TPU regions)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierHeavy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GPT Image 2 or Midjourney?
Midjourney uses 50% more energy per query than GPT Image 2. GPT Image 2 uses 5.0 Wh per query, while Midjourney uses 7.5 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT Image 2 and Midjourney?
Midjourney uses 5% more CO₂ per query than GPT Image 2. GPT Image 2 emits 2.2 g of CO₂ per query compared to Midjourney's 2.3 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT Image 2 or Midjourney?
GPT Image 2 is the more environmentally friendly option, using 5.0 Wh per query compared to Midjourney's 7.5 Wh. That makes Midjourney roughly 1.5x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GPT Image 2 and Midjourney adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute