Model Comparison
GPT-4o vs Nemotron 3 Super
GPT-4o: Ultra-efficientNemotron 3 Super: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison.
Both models use roughly the same energy per query
0.45 Wh vs 0.43 Wh per query · 0.20 g vs 0.19 g CO₂ · 2 mL vs 2 mL water
GPT-4o
OpenAI
Energy per query0.43 Wh
CO₂ per query0.19 g
Water per query2 mL
VS
Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
Energy per query0.45 Wh
CO₂ per query0.20 g
Water per query2 mL
GPT-4o
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidencepeer-reviewed
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Nemotron 3 Super
ProviderNVIDIA
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationSelf-hosted / NVIDIA NIM
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GPT-4o or Nemotron 3 Super?
GPT-4o and Nemotron 3 Super use roughly the same amount of energy per query. GPT-4o uses 0.43 Wh per query, while Nemotron 3 Super uses 0.45 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT-4o and Nemotron 3 Super?
Nemotron 3 Super uses 5% more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o. GPT-4o emits 0.19 g of CO₂ per query compared to Nemotron 3 Super's 0.20 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT-4o or Nemotron 3 Super?
Both models have very similar environmental footprints. GPT-4o uses 0.43 Wh per query while Nemotron 3 Super uses 0.45 Wh.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GPT-4o and Nemotron 3 Super adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute