Model Comparison
GPT-4o vs Mistral Small 3
GPT-4o: Ultra-efficientMistral Small 3: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. GPT-4o uses 23% more energy per query.
GPT-4o uses 23% more energy than Mistral Small 3
0.43 Wh vs 0.35 Wh per query · 0.19 g vs 0.02 g CO₂ · 2 mL vs 0.35 mL water
GPT-4o
OpenAI
Energy per query0.43 Wh
CO₂ per query0.19 g
Water per query2 mL
VS
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
Energy per query0.35 Wh
CO₂ per query0.02 g
Water per query0.35 mL
GPT-4o
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidencepeer-reviewed
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Mistral Small 3
ProviderMistral AI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationSelf-hosted / Mistral API
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GPT-4o or Mistral Small 3?
GPT-4o uses 23% more energy per query than Mistral Small 3. GPT-4o uses 0.43 Wh per query, while Mistral Small 3 uses 0.35 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GPT-4o and Mistral Small 3?
GPT-4o uses 10.9x more CO₂ per query than Mistral Small 3. GPT-4o emits 0.19 g of CO₂ per query compared to Mistral Small 3's 0.02 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GPT-4o or Mistral Small 3?
Mistral Small 3 is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.35 Wh per query compared to GPT-4o's 0.43 Wh. That makes GPT-4o roughly 1.2x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GPT-4o and Mistral Small 3 adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute