Model Comparison
GLM-5 vs GPT-4o Mini
GLM-5: StandardGPT-4o Mini: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. GLM-5 uses 8.6x more energy per query.
GLM-5 uses 8.6x more energy than GPT-4o Mini
1.2 Wh vs 0.14 Wh per query · 0.63 g vs 0.06 g CO₂ · 4 mL vs 0.50 mL water
GLM-5
Zhipu AI
Energy per query1.2 Wh
CO₂ per query0.63 g
Water per query4 mL
VS
GPT-4o Mini
OpenAI
Energy per query0.14 Wh
CO₂ per query0.06 g
Water per query0.50 mL
GLM-5
ProviderZhipu AI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationZhipu AI Cloud (China)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard
GPT-4o Mini
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, GLM-5 or GPT-4o Mini?
GLM-5 uses 8.6x more energy per query than GPT-4o Mini. GLM-5 uses 1.2 Wh per query, while GPT-4o Mini uses 0.14 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between GLM-5 and GPT-4o Mini?
GLM-5 uses 10.5x more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o Mini. GLM-5 emits 0.63 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o Mini's 0.06 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, GLM-5 or GPT-4o Mini?
GPT-4o Mini is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.14 Wh per query compared to GLM-5's 1.2 Wh. That makes GLM-5 roughly 8.6x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of GLM-5 and GPT-4o Mini adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute