Model Comparison
Gemma 3 4B vs GPT-4o Mini
Gemma 3 4B: Ultra-efficientGPT-4o Mini: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. GPT-4o Mini uses 75% more energy per query.
GPT-4o Mini uses 75% more energy than Gemma 3 4B
0.14 Wh vs 0.08 Wh per query · 0.06 g vs 0.03 g CO₂ · 0.50 mL vs 0.30 mL water
Gemma 3 4B
Google
Energy per query0.08 Wh
CO₂ per query0.03 g
Water per query0.30 mL
VS
GPT-4o Mini
OpenAI
Energy per query0.14 Wh
CO₂ per query0.06 g
Water per query0.50 mL
Gemma 3 4B
ProviderGoogle
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationSelf-hosted (varies)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
GPT-4o Mini
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Gemma 3 4B or GPT-4o Mini?
GPT-4o Mini uses 75% more energy per query than Gemma 3 4B. Gemma 3 4B uses 0.08 Wh per query, while GPT-4o Mini uses 0.14 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Gemma 3 4B and GPT-4o Mini?
GPT-4o Mini uses 2.0x more CO₂ per query than Gemma 3 4B. Gemma 3 4B emits 0.03 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o Mini's 0.06 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Gemma 3 4B or GPT-4o Mini?
Gemma 3 4B is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.08 Wh per query compared to GPT-4o Mini's 0.14 Wh. That makes GPT-4o Mini roughly 1.8x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Gemma 3 4B and GPT-4o Mini adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute