Model Comparison
DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs GPT-4o
DeepSeek-V4-Flash: StandardGPT-4o: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. DeepSeek-V4-Flash uses 2.3x more energy per query.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash uses 2.3x more energy than GPT-4o
1.0 Wh vs 0.43 Wh per query · 0.53 g vs 0.19 g CO₂ · 4 mL vs 2 mL water
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
DeepSeek
Energy per query1.0 Wh
CO₂ per query0.53 g
Water per query4 mL
VS
GPT-4o
OpenAI
Energy per query0.43 Wh
CO₂ per query0.19 g
Water per query2 mL
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
ProviderDeepSeek
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationDeepSeek Cloud (China) / self-hosted
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard
GPT-4o
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidencepeer-reviewed
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, DeepSeek-V4-Flash or GPT-4o?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash uses 2.3x more energy per query than GPT-4o. DeepSeek-V4-Flash uses 1.0 Wh per query, while GPT-4o uses 0.43 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between DeepSeek-V4-Flash and GPT-4o?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash uses 2.8x more CO₂ per query than GPT-4o. DeepSeek-V4-Flash emits 0.53 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o's 0.19 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, DeepSeek-V4-Flash or GPT-4o?
GPT-4o is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.43 Wh per query compared to DeepSeek-V4-Flash's 1.0 Wh. That makes DeepSeek-V4-Flash roughly 2.3x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of DeepSeek-V4-Flash and GPT-4o adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute