Model Comparison
Cursor vs Replit Agent
Cursor: StandardReplit Agent: Standard
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Replit Agent uses 25% more energy per query.
Replit Agent uses 25% more energy than Cursor
1.5 Wh vs 1.2 Wh per query · 0.65 g vs 0.50 g CO₂ · 6 mL vs 5 mL water
Cursor
Anysphere
Energy per query1.2 Wh
CO₂ per query0.50 g
Water per query5 mL
VS
Replit Agent
Replit
Energy per query1.5 Wh
CO₂ per query0.65 g
Water per query6 mL
Cursor
ProviderAnysphere
CategoryCode Assistant
Inference LocationMulti-cloud (Azure, AWS)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard
Replit Agent
ProviderReplit
CategoryCode Assistant
Inference LocationGoogle Cloud (US)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Cursor or Replit Agent?
Replit Agent uses 25% more energy per query than Cursor. Cursor uses 1.2 Wh per query, while Replit Agent uses 1.5 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Cursor and Replit Agent?
Replit Agent uses 30% more CO₂ per query than Cursor. Cursor emits 0.50 g of CO₂ per query compared to Replit Agent's 0.65 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Cursor or Replit Agent?
Cursor is the more environmentally friendly option, using 1.2 Wh per query compared to Replit Agent's 1.5 Wh. That makes Replit Agent roughly 1.3x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Cursor and Replit Agent adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute