Model Comparison
Claude 3 Haiku vs GPT-4o
Claude 3 Haiku: Ultra-efficientGPT-4o: Ultra-efficient
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. GPT-4o uses 7% more energy per query.
GPT-4o uses 7% more energy than Claude 3 Haiku
0.43 Wh vs 0.40 Wh per query · 0.19 g vs 0.14 g CO₂ · 2 mL vs 0.75 mL water
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Energy per query0.40 Wh
CO₂ per query0.14 g
Water per query0.75 mL
VS
GPT-4o
OpenAI
Energy per query0.43 Wh
CO₂ per query0.19 g
Water per query2 mL
Claude 3 Haiku
ProviderAnthropic
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAWS US East / GCP
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
GPT-4o
ProviderOpenAI
CategoryText / Chat
Inference LocationAzure US East / Sweden
Confidencepeer-reviewed
Efficiency TierUltra-efficient
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Claude 3 Haiku or GPT-4o?
GPT-4o uses 7% more energy per query than Claude 3 Haiku. Claude 3 Haiku uses 0.40 Wh per query, while GPT-4o uses 0.43 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-4o?
GPT-4o uses 36% more CO₂ per query than Claude 3 Haiku. Claude 3 Haiku emits 0.14 g of CO₂ per query compared to GPT-4o's 0.19 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Claude 3 Haiku or GPT-4o?
Claude 3 Haiku is the more environmentally friendly option, using 0.40 Wh per query compared to GPT-4o's 0.43 Wh. That makes GPT-4o roughly 1.1x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-4o adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute