Model Comparison
Amazon Q Developer vs Cursor
Amazon Q Developer: StandardCursor: Standard
Side-by-side environmental impact comparison. Cursor uses 20% more energy per query.
Cursor uses 20% more energy than Amazon Q Developer
1.2 Wh vs 1.0 Wh per query · 0.50 g vs 0.45 g CO₂ · 5 mL vs 4 mL water
Amazon Q Developer
Amazon
Energy per query1.0 Wh
CO₂ per query0.45 g
Water per query4 mL
VS
Cursor
Anysphere
Energy per query1.2 Wh
CO₂ per query0.50 g
Water per query5 mL
Amazon Q Developer
ProviderAmazon
CategoryCode Assistant
Inference LocationAWS
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard
Cursor
ProviderAnysphere
CategoryCode Assistant
Inference LocationMulti-cloud (Azure, AWS)
Confidenceestimated
Efficiency TierStandard
Frequently Asked Questions
Which uses more energy, Amazon Q Developer or Cursor?
Cursor uses 20% more energy per query than Amazon Q Developer. Amazon Q Developer uses 1.0 Wh per query, while Cursor uses 1.2 Wh.
What is the carbon footprint difference between Amazon Q Developer and Cursor?
Cursor uses 11% more CO₂ per query than Amazon Q Developer. Amazon Q Developer emits 0.45 g of CO₂ per query compared to Cursor's 0.50 g.
Which is more environmentally friendly, Amazon Q Developer or Cursor?
Amazon Q Developer is the more environmentally friendly option, using 1.0 Wh per query compared to Cursor's 1.2 Wh. That makes Cursor roughly 1.2x more energy-intensive.
Calculate your footprint with these models
See how your daily usage of Amazon Q Developer and Cursor adds up over time. Our calculator estimates energy, carbon, and water impact.
Calculate My Compute